A space for your point of view
Good writing starts with something worth exploring. Talkbase Voice gives you two AI partners to help you work through an idea, develop an article, and adapt it for different audiences. Your thinking and editorial choices guide the work.
New here? Click Get started to create your account, then verify your email to complete registration.
In good company
You don't need a polished prompt or a finished outline. Start with a question, an observation, or a position you're still working out.
Work through what you mean before deciding how to say it. Smith helps you explore an idea, examine the argument, and develop it into an article when you're ready to draft. A separate editorial pass checks the writing against your developed argument and guidelines, and you can keep refining it through conversation.
Give your article a different presentation for a particular audience. Toto works from a snapshot of your article to prepare a LinkedIn post, Facebook post, or Email Newsletter. You can review and refine the adaptation without changing the source article.
You decide what to use. Preparing an adaptation doesn't publish a post or send an email.
From thought to form
Explore a short example of an idea becoming an article and then taking different forms for different readers.
Illustrative example, written for this demonstration. These excerpts aren't a live AI session or a claim about typical output. Nothing here is published or sent.
“I want to explore why replacing a project-management tool doesn't necessarily fix unclear decisions. Imagine a team moving the same unresolved approvals into a new system. I'm not saying software doesn't matter; I'm saying the decision process may need attention too.”
Illustrative starting idea
Replacing a project-management tool can remove real friction. A clearer interface or a better way to share information may help a team work more easily. But those improvements don't decide who owns an approval or what happens when two priorities conflict.
Imagine a team moving its work into a new system while leaving an unresolved approval process intact. The tasks might be easier to find, yet the same question remains: who can make the decision that moves them forward? The software has changed, but the uncertainty has moved with the work.
That doesn't make the replacement a mistake. It suggests that choosing a tool and clarifying the decision process are related pieces of work. Before expecting the new system to resolve a delay, the team can examine whether the delay comes from the interface, missing information, or an unanswered question about responsibility.
Illustrative article excerpt · Author review remains separate
Audience: Product and operations professionals. Objective: Invite discussion about workflow decisions.
A better project-management tool can make work easier to see without making an unresolved decision easier to make.
Imagine a team moving the same unclear approvals into a new system. The interface improves, but responsibility for the next decision is still uncertain. That doesn't mean the software change was wrong. It means the decision process deserves attention alongside the tool.
I'd be interested in how others distinguish friction in the software from uncertainty about who can move the work forward.
Illustrative LinkedIn adaptation · Not posted
The editorial manifesto
Your editorial guidelines belong to your account. They give Smith and Toto direction on tone, vocabulary, structure, audience and evidence when they're writing for you.
Eligible new authors can start with the Talkbase Editorial Foundation, an independent starting set of guidelines they can make their own. As you write and give feedback, you can identify ways to refine your editorial guidelines. In Voice Settings, you can edit them or work through suggested changes conversationally. Lasting changes take effect only after you review and approve them.
Existing work keeps the voice version associated with it. A correction to one article doesn't automatically become a permanent writing rule, and your guidelines don't change how the agents speak with you in ordinary conversation.
See how your editorial voice worksWhat informs the work
Four kinds of context help keep the work connected. They're used for the relevant task rather than treated as interchangeable instructions.
Shared principles guide the agents to respect your decisions, question meaningful gaps, and be clear about evidence and uncertainty.
Smith develops ideas and articles. Toto adapts an existing article for a channel and audience.
Your active editorial guidelines guide new writing. Work already underway can keep its original voice snapshot.
Smith works with the topic conversation, examples and article. Toto works with the selected article snapshot, audience, objective and adaptation feedback.
Your voice shapes the writing. The conversation helps you make editorial decisions.
The next page is yours
Start a conversation with Smith, shape an article, and turn to Toto when you want to adapt it. You stay responsible for the argument, the voice, and the final decision.
Get startedCreate an account and verify your email, or sign in to continue your work.